000			01585cad a22002055a 4500
001			L142788
008			080310e20071130xxk f w 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u142788
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aAshley Gardens Freeholds Ltd v Cole _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_aLRX/130/2006, 5 November 2007. Considers works which may be levied upon a tenant's service charge account by a landlord. The landlord company (A) appealed against a decision that it was unable to make charges in respect of preparatory work for painting to the tenant (C) by applying them to his service charge account. A clause in A's contract permitted such charges for repair, but C had argued that the works were not for the purposes of repair but rather for decoration, which was already covenanted for. "Held": The clause enabled A to charge for repair works. This was enabled by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 as well as by another clause within the lease. Although the works included repair and not simply preparation and painting, A was still able to charge this as it was work for the proper maintenance of the buildings, as permitted by the lease. Appeal allowed.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aASHLEY GARDENS FREEHOLDS LTD V COLE
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL SERVICE CHARGES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.landstribunal.gov.uk/aspx/view.aspx?id=471 _zView the judgment free of charge at www.landstribunal.gov.uk...
942			_n0
999			_c79941 _d79941