000			01896cad a22002055a 4500
001			L143025
008			080402e20080227xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143025
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aCantillon Ltd v Urvasco Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_a[2008] EWHC 282 (TCC), 27 February 2008. Considers issues relating to natural justice, jurisdiction and the possible severability of parts of an adjudicator's decision. Claimant company (C) was engaged by defendant company (U) to carry out building works under a JCT standard form contract containing the standard adjudication clause. Disputes arose regarding C's claimed entitlement to extensions of time, which included a particular 13 week period, with related loss and expense. At adjudication, the adjudicator identified a later period of over nine weeks prolongation for which C was entitled to be compensated. U argued that the adjudicator should have made his decision based on the 13-week period and had therefore exceeded his jurisdiction and failed to comply with the rules of natural justice. C sought to enforce the adjudicator's decision. "Held": judgment for C; the adjudicator's decision to make the award for the recovery of prolongation costs arising out of a later period rather than the 13 week period specified in the original claim did not result in a material breach of the rules of natural justice.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aCANTILLON LTD V URVASCO LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2008/282.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80023 _d80023