000			01835cab a22002295a 4500
001			L143147
008			080410e20080129xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143147
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aOfulue v Bossert _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_a[2008] EWCA Civ 7, 29 January 2008. Considers whether an appeal against the acquisition of a property by adverse possession should follow or be distinguished from the case of Pye Ltd v United Kingdom (L131742). O appealed against a decision granting B adverse possession of a property previously owned by them. The property had been in a state of disrepair when O discovered B and her father residing in the property and asked them to leave. O was unable to initiate proceedings, but did so six years later having made two further demands to vacate. B's father had countered that he had made significant improvements but died before the case was brought. However B had made offer to purchase the property in a without prejudice letter and claimed to be a tenant. O argued this showed B's acceptance of O's ownership. "Held": To gain adverse possession B merely had to show intention to own the property. O had objected to B's residence, but had also slept on their rights. B had continually pleaded adverse possession and her letters and acknowledgment of O's claim did not amount to admission that O had a better claim of possession. Appeal dismissed.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aOFULUE AND ANOR V BOSSERT
650	2	4	_aPYE (OXFORD) LTD & ANOR V UNITED KINGDOM
650	2	4	_aPYE V GRAHAM
650	2	4	_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002
650	2	4	_aLIMITATION ACT 1990 S29
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/7.html _zView the item free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80070 _d80070