000			01744cad a22002055a 4500
001			L143203
008			080415e20071130xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143203
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aPC Harrington Contractors Ltd v Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWHC 2833 (TCC), 30 November 2007. Considers the interaction between the payment provisions of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and the subcontract clause in relation to payment, certification and deductions. Respondent contractor (M) and applicant sub-contractor (P) were in dispute as to the effect of an interim payment certificate issued by M under a subcontract between the parties. P applied for a declaration that M owed it a sum that was due and payable and that sum could be taken into account in an adjudication commenced by M under the terms of the sub-contract. "Held": application refused. In the interim payment certificate, the amount identified as nett payment did not represent a sum that P was entitled to receive because it did not take account of the deductions that M had set against it. Therefore P could not claim that that sum was due and payable in an adjudication started by M in respect of alleged defective works.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aPC HARRINGTON CONTRACTORS LTD V MULTIPLEX CONSTRUCTIONS (UK) LTD
650	2	4	_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2007/2833.htm _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80091 _d80091