000			01342cab a22002055a 4500
001			L143238
008			080418s2008 xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143238
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aCommercial development _bjoint venture, heads of terms, construction
260			_c2008
490		0	_aCommercial Leases _v22(1) February 2008, 1301-1302(2)
520			_aDiscusses the case of Stephen Curley and another v Jayson Hollier [2007]. The case concerned a joint venture (JV) project to redevelop an empty grade II listed building which did not go ahead as scheduled. The developers (C) claimed interest on a loan made to the defendant owners (H) plus the value of the guaranteed profits under the JV. Covers the background to the case; the claim; the defence; the issue (what was meant by the JV proceeding) and the decision. Held: the meaning of proceeding is not clear and either party's meaning could be allowed for. The court found in favour of the claimant (C), finding that they had done their reasonable best to progress the project.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aSTEPHEN CURLEY AND ANOTHER V JAYSON HOLLIER
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING TYPES-ANCIENT MONUMENTS AND HISTORIC BUILDINGS-LISTED BUILDINGS
942			_n0
999			_c80105 _d80105