| 000 | 01347cad a22001815a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L143242 | ||
| 008 | 080418e20080125xxk f v 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u143242 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aHiscox Syndicates Ltd and anor v Pinnacle Ltd and ors _h[electronic resource] |
| 520 | _a[2008] 145(Ch). This case is a reminder that the courts have the power to limit vibration caused by construction works. The case concerned the balance of inconvenience in a private nuisance action for a claimant (H) seeking an injunction to prevent excessive noise and vibration caused by demolition works next door carried out by the defendant (P) to build a new office block in the City of London. H wanted the injunction to set limits on nuisance, especially vibration levels. Held: injunction granted. An obligation to use all reasonable or best endeavours is more onerous than an obligation to use reasonable endeavours. An excesses of vibration levels can be a criminal offence. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHISCOX SYNDICATES LTD AND ANOTHER V PINNACLE LTD AND ORS |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2008/145.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c80107 _d80107 |
||