000			01548cad a22002295a 4500
001			L143247
008			080418e20071018xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143247
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aMcCarthy and McCarthy v Pendle BC _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_aACQ/76/2006. The Lands Tribunal had to determine the compensation payable by a local authority to the claimants following a compulsory purchase of a retail premises for development purposes. The property was located in a good secondary shopping area. The claimants were unable to find suitable alternative premises, so compensation was agreed on the basis of total extinguishment of the business. The parties did not agree on the value of the freehold interest and the basis for calculating this. Held: property valued on the basis of open market evidence (i.e. property value assessed by comparison to neighbouring properties) as opposed to values agreed under the shadow of compulsory purchase. Compensation assessed.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLANDS TRIBUNAL ACT 1949
650	2	4	_aHORN V SUNDERLAND CORP
650	2	4	_aDIRECTOR OF BUILDINGS AND LANDS V SHUN FUNG IRONWORKS LTD
650	2	4	_aSCENEOUT LTD V CENTRAL MANCHESTER DEVELOPMENT CORP
651		4	_aEngland and Wales
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2007/ACQ_182_2006.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80111 _d80111