000			01627cab a22002775a 4500
001			L143262
008			080422e20080419xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143262
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aRoberts, Philip
245	0	0	_aHypothetically speaking
260			_c2008
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0815) 19 April 2008, 168-169(2)
520			_aMainly for Students article provides guidance on rent reviews for commercial leases. These periodic reviews are intended to keep commercial rent at or above the current market value. They can involve formal or informal discussions between the parties. Recommends that they are not performed against a background of tight time constraints. Reviews are valued as a hypothetical lease which ignores contingencies which may produce an unfair value, such as a tenant's history at a given location. Details common assumption within leases and underlines the importance of the process to the market. Case law.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aUNITED SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS LTD V BURNLEY BC
650	2	4	_aCENTRAL ESTATES LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT
650	2	4	_aNATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC V ARTHUR YOUNG MCLELLAND MOORES AND CO
650	2	4	_aNORWICH UNION LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY V TRUSTEE SAVINGS BANKS CENTRAL BOARD
650	2	4	_aBRITISH GAS CORPORATION V UNIVERSITIES SUPERANNUATION SCHEME LTD
650	2	4	_aCANARY WHARF INVESTMENTS V TELEGRAPH GROUP LTD
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996
651		4	_aUnited Kingdom _y
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-RENT REVIEW (BUSINESS TENANCIES)
942			_n0
999			_c80122 _d80122