000			01806cad a22002535a 4500
001			L143263
008			080422e20080419xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143263
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aDobson, Sally
245	0	0	_aForsyth-Grant v Allen and another
260			_c2008
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0815) 19 April 2008, 172(1)
520			_a[2008] 15 EG 172(CS), 8 April 2008. The appellant (F) owned a hotel on land adjoining a site upon which the respondents (G) intended to develop. F raised several objections including a claim that such development would interfere with the right to light in the hotel. F claimed that the circumstances merited an order made with reference to G's profits and requested accounts. F then refused access to the hotel for the purposes of determination until a court order was made. An award was made based on loss of value due to loss of light. F appealed against the refusal to order an account of profits. "Held": The standard remedy was an award for damages. An account of profits was only applied in cases where a defendant had infringed the proprietary rights of the claimant. There were no such circumstances or other exceptional factors within this case. Appeal dismissed.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aCARR-SAUNDERS V DICK MCNEIL ASSOCIATES LTD
650	2	4	_aTAMARES (VINCENT SQUARE) LTD V FAIRPOINT PROPERTIES (VINCENT SQUARE) LTD
650	2	4	_aSTOKE-ON-TRENT CC V W & J WASS LTD
650	2	4	_aAMEC DEVELOPMENTS LTD V JURY'S HOTEL MANAGEMENT (UK) LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-EASEMENTS-RIGHTS TO LIGHT DETERMINATION-RIGHTS TO LIGHT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/505.html _zView this item free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80123 _d80123