000			01349cab a22002535a 4500
001			L143364
008			080429e20080418xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143364
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aGreer, Sarah
245	0	0	_aWatching the clock
260			_c2008
490			_aNew Law Journal _v158(7317) 18 April 2008, 548-549(2)
520			_aExamines the decision in Ashe v National Westminster Bank plc, and suggests that it may encourage lenders to evict defaulting mortgagors sooner. Presents the facts of the case. The main issue was whether the bank's rights in the property had been extinguished through adverse possession. The had delayed seeking possession for longer than the statutory 12-year limitation. Suggests that to avoid such problems, lenders should limit their right to possession to defaulted payments. Close monitoring of the limitation period and relevant issues is also advocated.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aASHE V NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC
650	2	4	_aLIMITATION ACT 1980
650	2	4	_aFOUR-MAIDS LTD V DUDLEY MARSHALL (PROPERTIES) LTD
650	2	4	_aPALK V MORTGAGE SERVICES FUNDING PLC
650	2	4	_aPYE V GRAHAM
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FINANCE AND INVESTMENT-MORTGAGING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
942			_n0
999			_c80155 _d80155