| 000 | 01893cad a22002055a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L143445 | ||
| 008 | 080509e20080206xxk f v 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u143445 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aGreenwood Reversions Ltd v World Environment Foundation Ltd and Madhav Mehra _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 | _c2008 | ||
| 520 | _a[2008] EWCA Civ 47, 6 February 2008. Considers whether a judge had been right to refuse a tenant relief from lease forfeiture in light of letters from his landlord. The appellant tenants (M and W) acquired a lease from the respondent landlord (G). When disagreements between the parties arose, M stopped paying rent, service charges and insurance. G obtained a consent judgment for payment of M's arrears. Without G's consent, M assigned the lease to W, a company in which he had an interest. G undertook proceedings against W on the basis the lease was forfeited. W assigned the lease back to M and G began proceedings against M. These had been successful. M and W argued that letters G had written demanding rent illustrated a willingness to continue the lease. "Held": It was sound to proceed on the basis that a demand for future rent would constitute a waiving of lease forfeiture. However upon objective inspection of G's letters it was clear G would not continue continuation of the lease without first receiving full payment. Given this, and additionally M's conduct throughout the lease and his attempts to avoid legal procedures, the verdict was sound. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aGREENWOOD REVERSIONS LTD V WORLD ENVIRONMENT FOUNDATION LTD AND ANOTHER |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146 |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 |
_aLandlord and tenant _96252 |
||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/47.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c80181 _d80181 |
||