000			01426cab a22002895a 4500
001			L143756
008			080529e20080513xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143756
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aCathie, Fergal
245	0	0	_aStopping the clock
260			_c2008
490			_aSolicitors' Journal _v152(19) 13 May 2008, 12-14(2)
520			_aConsiders the effect of recent legal decisions upon the extent of liability of professional advisers. Cases such as Watkins v Jones Maidment Wilson (L143449) have shown that limitation periods can be considered as starting on the date advice fails to be beneficial, rather than the date it is acted upon. This will take more cases out of the scope of the Limitation Acts. Considers earlier cases which were decided differently, but within a different mortgage framework. Suggests that fewer cases will be settled on limitation at preliminary stages.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aWATKINS V JONES MAIDMENT WILSON
650	2	4	_aLAW SOCIETY V SEPHTON
650	2	4	_aFORSTER V OUTRED
650	2	4	_aSOUTH AUSTRALIA ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION V YORK MONTAGUE LTD
650	2	4	_aSHORE V SEDGWICK FINANCIAL SERVICES
650	2	4	_aLIMITATION ACT 1980
650	2	4	_aLIMITATION ACT 1990
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
700	1		_aSchooling, Simon
942			_n0
999			_c80261 _d80261