000			01517cab a22002655a 4500
001			L143773
008			080530e20080516xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143773
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aAllen, Tony
245	0	0	_aEnforced security
260			_c2008
490		0	_aNew Law Journal _v158 (7321) 16 May 2008, 688-689 (2)
520			_aNotes the decision by the parties in Carleton v Strutt & Parker to waive rights to privilege over mediation proceedings. Examines this in light of the court's later decision in Cumbria Waste Management Ltd v Baines Wilson. The case turned on whether disclosure could be ordered by the court against the wishes of one of the parties to the mediation, where the conduct of the representatives of the other party was subject to a professional negligence claim. Considers the extent of the confidentiality provisions within mediation agreements and the operation of "without prejudice" privilege.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aCUMBRIA WASTE MANAGEMENT LTD V BAINES WILSON LTD
650	2	4	_aCARLETON V STRUTT & PARKER (A PARTNERSHIP)
650	2	4	_aBROWN V RICE AND PATEL
650	2	4	_aSOCIETE INTERNATIONALE DE TELECOMMUNICATIONS AERONAUTIQUES SC V WYATT CO (UK) LTD
650	2	4	_aMULLER V LINSLEY & MORTIMER
650	2	4	_aRUSH AND TOMPKINS LTD V GREATER LONDON COUNCIL AND ANOTHER
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
942			_n0
999			_c80269 _d80269