000			01572cad a22002055a 4500
001			L143781
008			080530e20080423xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143781
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aBrown and Sons Ltd v Crosby Homes (North West) Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_a[2008] EWHC 817 (TCC).The applicant (B), a loosing party in an arbitration, applied for leave to extend its time for service of the application. B asserted that documents disclosed in a second, subsequent arbitration would have produced a different outcome and so appealed. The court was reluctant to allow the losing party the opportunity to rely on this material in any appeal, even though its veracity was questioned by B. This was because the task of assessing this evidence had been left by the parties to the arbitrator. Held: Application refused. There was no good reason for the delay, especially in a weak case. Witholding documents might be reprehensible. However, withholding or non-disclosure of documents not ordered to be disclosed by the arbitrator or which had not been agreed to be disclosed could not be reprehensible.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996
650	2	4	_aBROWN (L) & SONS LTD V CROSBY HOMES (NORTH WEST) LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2008/817.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.baiili.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80275 _d80275