000			01418cad a22002055a 4500
001			L143818
008			080603e20080429xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143818
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aAvoncroft Construction Ltd v Sharba Homes (CN) Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_a[2008] EWHC 933 (TCC). Normally, a valid adjudicator's decision must be complied with. There is not usually any entitlement to withhold liquidated damages. The defendant resisted the application for enforcement of an adjudicators decision on the ground that it was entitled to set off LADs (liquidation damages clauses) against the sum awarded. Alternatively, the defendant sought a stay of execution, or an order that the money be paid into court and not distributed until the outcome of a second adjudication. The main issue was the withholding of liquidated damages from a sum directed to be paid by an adjudicator. Held: applications both rejected.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aAVONCROFT CONSTRUCTION LTD V SHARBA HOMES (CN) LTD
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2008/933.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.baiili.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80288 _d80288