000			01396cab a22002535a 4500
001			L143859
008			080604e20080523xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143859
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aColenso, Adam
245	0	0	_aBe reasonable
260			_c2008
490			_aNew Law Journal _v158(7322) 23 May 2008, 729-131(3)
520			_aDetails the importance of the role played by the Lands Valuation Tribunal (LVT) in obtaining special dispensations under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Argues that the LVT should no longer grant dispensations against the requirement to consult tenants regarding long-term agreements with contractors. Details the case of Auger v LB Camden (L143135) and cites this as an example of an incorrectly granted right to dispense with the need to consult leaseholders. Outlines the grounds on which the LVT should decide reasonableness in these circumstances. The extent to which the leaseholders' protection is undermined should also be given close attention.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985 S20
650	2	4	_aCOMMONHOLD AND LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 2002 S20
650	2	4	_aAUGER V LB CAMDEN
650	2	4	_aSERVICE CHARGES (CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS) (ENGLAND) REGULATIONS 2003
651		4	_aEngland _y886-
690			_aPROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT
700	1		_aKilcoyne, Desmond
942			_n0
999			_c80291 _d80291