000			02039cad a22002175a 4500
001			L144184
008			080702e20080625xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u144184
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aEarl Cadogan & Ors v 26 Cadogan Square Ltd ; Howard De Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio and Ors _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_a[2008] UKHL 44. The case turned around whether or not the head lessee of a block of flats was a qualifying tenant for the purpose of claiming a lease extension under the Leasehold, Reform and Urban Development Act 1993 Part 1 Chapter II. In both conjoined cases, a self-contained building converted into several self-contained flats had been let under a lease for sixty five years at ground rent. Each building had common parts included in the relevant headleases, but not under any of the underleases. Some of the flats were vacant. In both cases the head lessee had sought to acquire a new lease from the freeholder under the 1993 Act. Both were rejected on the grounds that the head lessee was not a qualifying tenant. Held: both appeals allowed. A head lessee under a block of flats (non of which was subject to lengthly underleases) was entitled to be a qualifying tenant, irrespective of whether the lessee was a property investor or resident, and irrespective of the nature or extent of other property included in the demise. The appeals were allowed against a previous decision of the Court of Appeal [2007] EWCA Civ 499 (L138460).
590			_aKA NTK
650	2	4	_aEARL CADOGAN AND CADOGAN ESTATES LTD V 26 CADOGAN SQUARE LTD
650	2	4	_aHOWARD DE WALDEN ESTATES LTD V AGGIO AND ORS
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD, REFORM AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL LEASES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd080625/cadoga.pdf _zView the article free of charge at www.publications.parliament.uk...
942			_n0 _2ddc
999			_c80375 _d80375