| 000 | 01545cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS38825 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u12578 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aThrasyvolou v SoS for the Environment and Hackney LBC | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Law Journal _v138(6342) 5 February 1988, 29-30(2) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 28 January 1988. Appeal by plaintiff (T) from a decision upholding the decision of a planning inspector who determined certain enforcement notice appeals in favour of the council (H). H had issued notices in 1982 to restrain T`s use of certain premises as hotels or hostels . T appealed and the notices were quashed by an inspector. In 1985 H served notices which stated that T was in breach of planning control by changing the use of the premises to a "hostel for homeless families". T appealed against the notices, but a different inspector upheld them. T`s subsequent appeal to QBD was dismissed. On appeal to CA the question of issue estoppel was raised. T argued that 1) when enforcement notices were served in 1985, decisions on some of the properties had already been made through the 1982 enforcement proceedings in favour of T; 2) in 1985 the circumstances were no different from those of 1982; 3) because of the doctrine of issue estoppel, H was prevented from contending in the 1985 p | ||
| 650 | _aCHANGE OF USE | ||
| 650 | _aWESTERN FISH PRODUCTS LTD V SOS | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c8039 _d8039 |
||