| 000 | 00890cab a22001935a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L144346 | ||
| 008 | 080714e20080613xxk f v 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u144346 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aRoss, Jonathan | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aFight of way _bcase news |
| 260 | _c2008 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aProperty Week _v73(24) 13 June 2008, 86(1) |
|
| 520 | _aDiscusses the case of Brooks and another v Young and another [2008] CA (Civ Div). The Court of Appeal had to decide whether or not the terms granted in a right of way to a householder should be interpreted in such a way as to limit its use and prevent the neighbouring householder from being disturbed. The appeal was allowed because the court of first instance had interpreted the right of way in an overly restrictive way. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 |
_aBoundary disputes _96221 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c80435 _d80435 |
||