000			02209cad a22003375a 4500
001			L144392
008			080716e20080606xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u144392
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aIn the matter of an application under section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 _bTillotson _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_aSee related article catalogued under the reference L145097
520			_a[2008] EWLands LP 56 2006, 06 June 2008. The case turned around whether landlords of expensive houses could oppose the development of an exclusive estate. The Tillotsons were granted planning permission to build an additional house on the land of their current home. However, restrictive covenants limited building to just one house per land. The Tillotsons applied to the Lands Tribunal to reject the covenant as invalid or to amend it to allow the building of the extra house. The neighbours opposed this. The tribunal examined whether the covenants gave benefits of such value to the neighbours that a financial compensation would be inadequate. The tribunal concluded that the estate substantially benefited from the restrictions from the covenants. Therefore, these covenants should be maintained as financial compensation would not be adequate to cover for the losses that would otherwise be incurred. "Held": Application rejected. The tribunal felt that the development could not be allowed as it would weaken the exclusivity of the area.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S84
650	2	4	_aSHEPHARD AND OTHERS V TURNER AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aGILBERT V SPOOR
650	2	4	_aSOLARFILMS (SALES) LTDS APPLICATION
650	2	4	_aMITMAN-KEAREY'S APPLICATION
650	2	4	_aHUNT'S APPLICATION
650	2	4	_aLEE'S APPLICATION
650	2	4	_aDOBBIN'S APPLICATION
650	2	4	_aSTANNARD V ISSA
650	2	4	_aFELTON HOMES LIMITED'S APPLICATION
650	2	4	_aMCMORRIS V BROWN
650	2	4	_aBASS LIMITED'S APPLICATION
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aBlock management _96220
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2008/LP_56_2006.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80450 _d80450