000			01883cad a22002775a 4500
001			L144526
008			080725e20080627xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u144526
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aGreen v Westleigh Properties Limits _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_a[2008] EWHC 1474 (QB) 27 June 2008. Despite a purchase notice being poorly drafted by a tenant wishing to purchase a landlord's revisionary notice in his property, it was not so poorly drafted that it would have confused a reasonable recipient and was therefore a valid purchase notice under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. Appellant G appealed against a judge's ruling that his application to purchase the revisionary interest in his property from the respondent landlord W was invalid. The ruling was made on the basis that the judge had made this decision as a result of errors and delays on the part of G in submitting the notice. Held: appeal allowed. The original decision was reversed, as the original judge should have taken account of the context around the notice to buy and that W could have been in no doubt that G and the other tenants involved wished to have the freehold interest in the premises transferred to them at that time.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1987
650	2	4	_aRAVENSEFT PROPERTIES LTD V HALL
650	2	4	_aGREEN V TWINSECTRA
650	2	4	_aMANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK
650	2	4	_aCARRADINE PROPERTIES LTD V ASLAM
650	2	4	_aTUDOR V M25 GROUP
650	2	4	_aGREEN V WESTLEIGH PROPERTIES LIMITS
650		4	_aHOUSING ACT 1987 S12A
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT
856	4	8	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2008/1474.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80508 _d80508