000 02647cad a22004095a 4500
001 L144528
008 080725e20080512xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u144528
041 0 _aeng
245 0 0 _aSG & R Valuation Service Co v Boudrais and Ors
_h[electronic resource]
260 _c2008
520 _a[2008] EWHC 1340 (QB) 12 May 2008. Where an employment bargain conferred the right to work, this was subject to the qualification that an employee had not, as some prior breach of contract, demonstrated that they were not willing to work. An employer had been justified to place employees on garden leave where there had been wrongdoing, despite there being no express contractual power to do so. Claimant (S) sought interim relief requiring defendant employees (B) to serve a period of garden leave. B had resigned and wrongdoing was noticed by S almost immediately, who asked B to take garden leave. B claimed that this was a repudiatory breach of contract and gave resignation with immediate effect, saying that they were not contractually obliged to stay at home for garden leave. Held: original contracts were accepted as being updated by the employee manual when it was updated, even if the manual was not issued with the original contracts and S had reasonable cause to request that B stay at home, as B was guilty of active wrongdoing.
590 _aKA
650 2 4 _aSG & R VALUATION SERVICE CO V BOUDRAIS AND ORS
650 2 4 _aMALIK V BANK OF CREDIT AND COMMERCE INTERNATIONAL SA
650 2 4 _aUNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM V FISHEL
650 2 4 _aLANSING LINDE LTD V KERR
650 2 4 _aCOLLIER V SUNDAY REFEREE PUBLISHING CO
650 2 4 _aMARBE V GEORGE EDWARDES (DALY'S THEATRE) LD
650 2 4 _aLAGERWALL V WILKINSON
650 2 4 _aHENDERSON AND CLARKE LD
650 2 4 _aTURNER V SAWDON AND CO
650 2 4 _aWILLIAM HILL ORGANISATION LTD V TUCKER
650 2 4 _aMILES V WAKEFIELD METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL
650 2 4 _aLANGSTON V AMALGAMATED UNION OF ENGINEERING WORKERS
650 2 4 _aTHOMAS MARSHALL (EXPORTS) LTD V GUINLE
650 2 4 _aRDF MEDIA GROUP PLC V CLEMENTS
650 2 4 _aBREMER VULCAN SCHIFFBAU UND MASCHINENFABRIK V SOUTH INDIA SHIPPING CORP
650 2 4 _aPAAL WILSON V PARTENREEDEREI HANNAH BLUMENTHAL
650 2 4 _aROGER BULLIVANT LTD V ELLIS
650 2 4 _aMIDAS IT SERVICES V OPUS PORTFOLIO LTD
650 2 4 _aPROVIDENT GROUP PLC V HAYWARD
651 4 _aUnited Kingdom
_y
690 _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2008/1340.html
_zView the case free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942 _n0
999 _c80510
_d80510