000			01955cad a22002415a 4500
001			L144660
008			080804e20080630xxk v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u144660
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aCamden v leaseholders of flats on Grafton Way _h[electronic resource]
520			_a[2008] EWLands LRX_185_2006, 30 June 2008. Case is of importance as it shows that residential service charges may not be recovered in cases where the correct procedures have not been followed. Camden owned two blocks of flats and consulted on proposed works to improve them in 2003-2004. The works were completed in 2006 and they tried to claim £504 000 in service charges from the residents; while the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal said that they were only entitled to £9 250, or £250 per flat as it failed to comply with the requirements of the Landlord and tenant Act 1985 as regards notification. Appeal dismissed: Lands Tribunal agreed that the main issue was whether prejudice had been suffered by tenants because of a failure to comply with the compensation requirements. The Tribunal found that the failure of Camden to provide information relating to the works (specifically estimates), was a gross error that prejudiced the tenants severely and impacted upon their basic rights to consultation.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aCAMDEN V LEASEHOLDERS OF FLATS ON GRAFTON WAY
650	2	4	_aAUGER & ORS V LONDON BOROUGH OF CAMDEN
650	2	4	_aELTHAM PROPERTIES LTD V KENNY & OTHERS
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985
650	2	4	_aSERVICE CHARGES (CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS) (ENGLAND) REGULATIONS 2003
650	2	4	_aWELLCOME TRUST LTD V ROMINES
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL SERVICE CHARGES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2008/LRX_185_2006.html _zView the item free of charge online at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80538 _d80538