000			01651cab a22002775a 4500
001			L144880
008			080815s2008 xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u144880
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aFord, Richard
245	0	0	_a"Theirs not to reason why" _bthe practicalities of providing adequate summary reasons for grants of planning permission
260			_c2008
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(2) 2008, 115-127(13)
520			_aHighlights a series of recent court judgements where local planning authorities have struggled to comply with the reasons for grant requirements. Difficulties faced include the need to summarise decisions that may have been made thanks to a large amount of factors; a lack of specific guidance for interpreting aspects of the General Development Procedure Order 2005 (GDPO) and problems describing the adequacy of reasons. The authors suggest making amendments to the current legislation, including changes to Article 22(1) of the GDPO.
650	2	4	_aR (ON THE APPLICATION OF TRATT) V HORSHAM DC
650	2	4	_aR (ON THE APPLICATION OF WALL) V BRIGHTON AND HOVE COUNCIL
650	2	4	_aSOUTH BUCKS DC V PORTER
650	2	4	_aGENERAL DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURE ORDER 1995 (AS AMENDED)
650	2	4	_aR (ON THE APPLICATION OF CHISNELL) V RICHMOND UPON THAMES LBC
650	2	4	_aR (ON THE APPLICATION OF LING (BRIDLINGTON) LTD V EAST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE COUNCIL
650	2	4	_aR (ON THE APPLICATION OF MID COUNTIES CO-OPERATIVE LTD) V FOREST OF DEAN DC
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
700	1		_aRichards, Hugh
942			_n0
999			_c80625 _d80625