000			01258cab a22002775a 4500
001			L144929
008			080820s2008 xxko f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u144929
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aShelton, Mark
245	0	0	_aBuyers lose out on deposit claims
260			_c2008
490			_aThe In-House Lawyer _v(160) May 2008, 83-85(3)
520			_aArticle looks at recent judicial findings in cases where deposits were witheld as a result of failure to complete on property transactions. In discussing the historical background, the author states that the level of discretion that can be applied to the legislation (Law of Property Act 1925 etc.) has been reduced over time and that defaulting buyers are now more likely than not lose their deposit.
650	2	4	_aPROPERTY ACT 1925 S40
650	2	4	_aTENNERO LTD V MAJORARCH LTD
650	2	4	_aUNIVERSAL CORPORATION V FIVE WAYS PROPERTIES LTD
650	2	4	_aLAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989 S2
650	2	4	_aOMAR V EL-WAKIL
650	2	4	_aPROFORCE RECRUIT LTD V THE RUGBY GROUP LTD
650	2	4	_aARIBISALA V ST JAMES HOMES (GROSVENOR DOCK) LTD
650	2	4	_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S49(2)
651		4	_aUnited Kingdom _y
690			_aPROPERTY
942			_n0
999			_c80649 _d80649