| 000 | 01156cab a22002535a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L145145 | ||
| 008 | 080911s2008 xxkao f v 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u145145 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aRussell, Paul | |
| 245 | 0 | 3 | _aAn empty promise |
| 260 | _c2008 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aInsight _vSeptember 2008, 30-31(2) |
|
| 520 | _aDescribes how ratepayers are increasingly seeking to reduce the burden of empty property rates by seeking an exemption to the relevant regulation (SI 2008: 386, see L142770), often through the courts. Comments on the relevant case law, explaining how the courts have affected the decision making process. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aRATING (EMPTY PROPERTIES) ACT 2007 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aWESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL V REGENT LION PROPERTIES |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHENDERSON V LIVERPOOL METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COUNCIL |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHAILBURY INVESTMENTS LTD V WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aTOWER HAMLETS (LBC) V ST KATHERINE BY THE TOWER LTD EASIWORK HOMES LTD V REDBRIDGE LONDON (BC) |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland _y886- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TAXATION-BUSINESS RATES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c80722 _d80722 |
||