000			01228cab a22002055a 4500
001			L145299
008			080924e20080711xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u145299
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aRoss, Jonathan
245	0	4	_aThe common touch _bcase news
260			_c2008
490			_aProperty Week _v73(28) 11 July 2008, 74(1)
520			_aDiscusses the case of Hicklane Properties Ltd v Bradbury Investments Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 691, 19 June 2008. The case showed that the courts will rely on good business sense to correct errors in documentation. The Court of Appeal found that a judge had been entitled to find that the parties to a lease of a property had a common intention that the freehold interest should be valued on the basis of open market value subject to the lease, instead of vacant possession as stated in the document agreed by the parties. This was because the judge's conclusion and his rectification order made commercial sense.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aHICKLANE PROPERTIES LTD V BRADBURY INVESTMENTS LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES
942			_n0
999			_c80767 _d80767