000			03038cab a22004335a 4500
001			L145303
008			080924e20071116xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u145303
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aSpirerose Ltd (In administration) v Transport for London _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_a[2007] EWLands ACQ_41_2005, 16 November 2007.The court had to determine the amount of compensation payable to the claimant property owner (S) by the defendant (T) for the compulsory purchase of industrial premises under the London Underground (East London Line Extension) Order 1997. Located in a mixed-use area, S sought compensation based on the development value of the land, because planning permission could reasonably have been expected. T countered that in the absence of actual planning permission, the correct approach would be to base valuation on hope value. Held: compensation assessed. The amount of compensation payable for mixed-use development based on an assumption that planning permission would have been granted in the no-scheme world, even though no such assumption fell to be made under the Land Compensation Act 1961. Pointe Gourde Quarrying and Transport Co v Sub-Intendent of Crown Lands, Melwood Units Pty v Commissioner of Main Roads and Jelson Ltd v Blaby DC applied. Lacking evidence of comparable properties, the tribunal used residual valuation.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aSPIREROSE LTD (IN ADMINISTRATION) V TRANSPORT FOR LONDON
650	2	4	_aFLETCHER ESTATES (HARLESCOTT) LTD V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT MELWOOD UNIT PTY LTD V COMMISSIONER OF MAIN ROADS
650	2	4	_aJELSON LTD V BLABY DC
650	2	4	_aPURFLEET FARMS LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT
650	2	4	_aPOINTE GOURDE QUARRYING AND TRANSPORT CO LTD V CROWN LANDS SUPERINTENDENT
650	2	4	_aWATERS V WELSH DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
650	2	4	_aJELSON LTD V MINISTER OF HOUSING AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
650	2	4	_aWILLIAMSON V CAMBRIDGESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
650	2	4	_aPENTREHOBYN TRUSTEES V NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES
650	2	4	_aSTAYLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD V SECRETARY OF STATE
650	2	4	_aHORN V SUNDERLAND CORPORATION
650	2	4	_aDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND LAND V SHUN FUNG LTD
650	2	4	_aPORTER V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT
650	2	4	_aMARGATE CORPN V DEVOTWILL INVESTMENTS LTD
650	2	4	_aDAVIES V TAYLOR
650	2	4	_aMYERS V MILTON KEYNES DEVELOPMENT CORPN
650	2	4	_aROBERTS V SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL
650	2	4	_aTHOMAS'S EXECUTORS V MERTHYR TYDFIL BC
650	2	4	_aRMC (UK) LTD V LONDON BOROUGH OF GREENWICH
650	2	4	_aESSEX COUNTY SHOWGROUND GROUP V ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL
650	2	4	_aSNOOK & ORS V SOMERSET COUNTY COUNCIL
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2007/ACQ_41_2005.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80771 _d80771