000			01320cab a22002055a 4500
001			L145327
008			080929e20080905xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u145327
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aGordon, Warren
245	0	0	_aParking offence _bcase notes
260			_c2008
490		0	_aProperty Week _v73(36) 5 September 2008, 73(1)
520			_aDiscusses the case of Herbert v Doyle and Talati [2008] EWHC 1959 (Ch), 4 August 2008. After a bitter neighbours' dispute lasting over a decade, a property developer failed to obtain parking spaces needed for his development. A developer bought land near a dental surgery. The dentists transferred their parking spaces to the developer for new spaces, but were unhappy with the parking arrangements. It was agreed that the developer's plan could go ahead, but only if he complied with all aspects of an agreement to relocate the spaces. The developer did not do so. Held: small damages were awarded to the dentists as the developer had not upheld his side of the agreement, despite the fact that the agreement was not binding.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
942			_n0
999			_c80775 _d80775