| 000 | 01061cab a22001935a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L145329 | ||
| 008 | 080929e20080822xxk f v 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u145329 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aDanger of danger _bcase news |
| 260 | _c2008 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aProperty Week _v73(34) 22 August 2008, 52(1) |
|
| 520 | _aSummarises the case of Birmingham Development Company v Tyler [2008] EWCH Civ 859, 24 July 2008 (see L145328). The Court of Appeal considered whether the actual or perceived risk of damage from an adjoining building is sufficient grounds for a claim of nuisance. Permission to appeal was dismissed, together with the injunction. The developer's concerns about the danger were based on inadequate investigations, so there was no reason why the factory owner should be liable to pay for their mistaken diagnosis. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aBIRMINGHAM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY V TYLER |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c80777 _d80777 |
||