| 000 | 01159cab a22002535a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L145502 | ||
| 008 | 081015e20081011xxk f v 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u145502 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aBoyne, Matthew | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aPros and cons of DIY |
| 260 | _c2008 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0840) 11 October 2008, 172-173(2) |
|
| 520 | _aExplains how landlords can avoid the pitfalls associated with Jervis v Harris clauses, which grant the landlord powers to enforce tenant repairs. Considers the difference between Jervis v Harris clauses and landlords' remedies set out in legislation. Provides working examples of clauses allowing the landlord to inspect, serve repair notices, enter the premises and carry out repairs, and claim repayment of repair costs. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aJERVIS V HARRIS |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S 146 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLEASEHOLD PROPERTY (REPAIRS) ACT 1938 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1927 S18(1) |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM LBC V CRESKA (NO 2) |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-SERVICE CHARGES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c80842 _d80842 |
||