000 01342cab a22002655a 4500
001 L145516
008 081017e20081007xxko f 000 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u145516
041 0 _aeng
100 1 _aWilson, Debra
245 0 0 _aLeft out in the cold
260 _c2008
490 _aSolicitors' Journal
_v7 October 2008, 14-15(2)
520 _aArticle looks at the introduction of tenancy deposit schemes (TDS) and acknowledges that they have been a very useful mechanism for avoiding typical disputes that were previously encountered at the end of residential tenancies. The author discusses the sanctions that can be enacted as part of the legislation and suggests that, while TDS have reduced the involvement of solicitors in the drafting of leases, the formation of a DCLG users' group may ultimately prove the worth solicitor participation in tenancy disputes.
590 _aKA
650 2 4 _aHARVEY V BAMFORTH
650 2 4 _aHOUSING ACT 1988 S19
650 2 4 _aHOUSING ACT 1996
650 2 4 _aHOUSING ACT 2004 S213
650 2 4 _aSTANKOVA V GLASSONBURY
651 4 _aEngland and Wales
_y1543-
690 _aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT
690 _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
942 _n0
999 _c80848
_d80848