000			02089cad a22002295a 4500
001			L145525
008			081020e20080815xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u145525
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aCJP Builders Limited v William Verry Limited _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_a[2008] EWHC 2025 (TCC), 15 August 2008. The case turned around the wording of a sub-contract and the right for an adjudicator to extend the time to answer a referral to adjudication, as not doing so was in effect a breach of the party's right under natural justice to be heard. Verry (V) sub-contracted with CJP Builders (C) to carry out work at a construction project. (V) did not pay (C) an interim payment. (C) claimed by adjudication the interim payment. The subcontract required (V) to respond within seven days. (V) answered late. The adjudicator disregarded that delayed answer and ordered (V) to pay (C). (C) asked for respect of the adjudicator's decision. (V) asked for the meaning of the sub-contract, contested the jurisdiction of the adjudicator, as well as the fact of disregarding his answer as a breach of his natural right to be heard; and claimed that (C) was not entitled to the payment that he required. "Held": The judge rejected the adjudicator's decision on the basis that the subcontract did allow him to consider (V)'s delayed answer. (C) is only entitled to the payment of sums properly due for work done by it.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aCJP BUILDERS LIMITED V WILLIAM VERRY LIMITED
650	2	4	_aTHOMAS-FREDRIC'S (CONSTRUCTION) LTD V WILSON PROJECT CONSULTANCY GROUP V TRUSTEES OF THE GRAY TRUST
650	2	4	_aCANTILLON LTD V URVASCO LTD
650	2	4	_aBUXTON BUILDING CONTRACTORS V DURAND PRIMARY SCHOOL GOVERNORS
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2008/2025.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80855 _d80855