| 000 | 01150cab a22002055a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L145562 | ||
| 008 | 081021e20080822xxk f v 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u145562 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aGordon, Warren | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aBlowing the recovery |
| 260 | _c2008 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aProperty Week _v73(34) 22 August 2008, 53(1) |
|
| 520 | _aDiscusses the case of Leonora Investment Company Ltd v Mott McDonald [2008] EWCA Civ 857, 23 July 2008, (see L145457). The case turned on whether a commercial landlord could claim the cost of improvement works as a service charge where there had been a failure to comply with the procedure set out in the service charge clause in the lease. The appeal was dismissed. The case is a timely reminder to landlords that they must follow all procedural requirements strictly in recovering service charges in the lease, otherwise recovery may not be possible. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLEONORA V MOTT MACDONALD |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL SERVICE CHARGES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c80876 _d80876 |
||