000			01532cab a22001935a 4500
001			L145576
008			081023e20080715xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u145576
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aJohnson v Luxcool Ltd & Ors _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_a[2008] EWCH 1591 (QB), 15 July 2008. Damages claims can only be pursued when the claimant has a legal basis for making a claim. A club owner (J) claimed damages for damage done to the structure of premises and damages to her goods following her eviction from the premises by the third defendant property owner (H). After J's eviction H had removed the roof. J claimed that goods under the roof had been damaged and that she had spend large sums fitting out the structure of the premises before eviction and so was entitled to compensation for loss of value of the works or cost of repairing the structures. Held: claim struck out. J was not a tenant of any part of the premises, but simply a trespasser or a bare license. J's claims depended on her having a tenancy. J's evidence was not reliable. There was no clear evidence that damage had been caused to goods allegedly belonging to J as a result of the removal of the roof.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aJOHNSON V LUXCOOL LTD & ORS
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2008/1591.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80886 _d80886