000			01687cad a22002535a 4500
001			L145803
008			081111e20081003xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u145803
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aHutchison and Ors v B & DF Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_a[2008] EWHC 2286 (Ch), 3 October 2008. Be cautious in negotiations to avoid legal commitments which are not wanted. The Court had to decide whether a legally binding lease had been granted in the face of conflicting accounts of negotiations. An airline food manufacturer (B) leased units on an estate owned by a property company (H). Due to local residents objecting to its activities, B moved premises when its lease with H expired in 2006 and took a lease on another factory. H argued that B had made verbal agreements to stay on the property for three years after 2006. Held: judgement for the claimant. The tenant B had made an oral agreement which was a binding commitment to the landlord and was ordered it to take the leases, as well as pay rent arrears.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S25
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S24
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S27
650	2	4	_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S2
650	2	4	_aLAW OF PROPERTY MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT 1989 S2
650	2	4	_aHUTCHISON AND OTHERS V B & DF LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2008/2286.html _zView the decision free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c80942 _d80942