| 000 | 01403cab a22002175a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L146238 | ||
| 008 | 081217s2008 xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u146238 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aBaatz, N | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aProblem management/dispute resolution in partnering contracts |
| 260 | _c2008 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers _bWaste and Resource Management _v(161) August 2008, 115-120(6) |
|
| 520 | _aDiscusses the problems that can arise in project team partnering which are often part of construction contracts. Defines partnering and notes the main partnering contracts. Using a worked example, explains how disputes may arise and how problems and disputes can be avoided. Considers whether the duties to co-operate or duties to act in good faith can make a practical difference. Comments on dispute resolution provisions in partnering contracts and suggests how disputes may be both avoided and resolved. Concludes that while partnering may be valuable it is not a panacea and that it is still necessary to consider how any possible dispute might be resolved. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMAY V GILES (VO) |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aBALFOUR BEATTY CIVIL ENGINEERING LTD V DOCKLANDS LIGHT RAILWAY LTD |
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c81094 _d81094 |
||