| 000 | 01328cab a22002175a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L146405 | ||
| 008 | 090116e20081219xxk f 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u146405 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aRoss, Jonathan | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aFinal say must be considered |
| 260 | _c2008 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aProperty Week _v74(51) 19 December 2008, 44(1) |
|
| 520 | _aDiscusses the case of Metropolitan Property Realizations Ltd v Atmore Investments Ltd [2008] EWCH 2925 (Ch) (see L146405). An arbitrator making a rent review determination in respect of a commercial lease had failed to take into account the notional tenant's profit in the calculation of a fair rent, so there had been a serious irregularity. The valuation method was rejected by the Court even though the landlord's surveyor had initially accepted it. Accordingly, the Court ordered that the review be resubmitted to the arbitrator who must reduce the rent award to allow for an appropriate profit margin for the tenant. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMETROPOLITAN PROPERTY REALIZATIONS LTD V ATMORE INVESTMENTS LTD |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-TENANCY RENT REVIEW | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c81138 _d81138 |
||