000			01833cab a22003615a 4500
001			L146408
008			090116s2008 xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u146408
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aAltaras, David
245	0	0	_aTime limits for appealing against or challenging an arbitral award in England and Wales
260			_c2008
490		0	_aArbitration _v74(4) November 2008, 360-368(9)
520			_aCommenting on a number of law cases, considers the themes of the finality of proceedings and the degree of flexibility in the application of the time limit. Highlights the importance of adhering to strict time limits in the prosecution of arbitration claims and appeals. Concludes that if a party wishes to appeal or challenge an award, it must act as quickly as possible so that the arbitration system can work effectively. Late comers can expect little sympathy from the courts and will need to present compelling reasons for the delay.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aSTUBBING V UNITED KINGDOM
650	2	4	_aPEREZ DE RADA CAVANILLES V SPAIN
650	2	4	_aLIMITATION ACT 1980
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996
650	2	4	_aAOOT KALMNEFT V GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG
650	2	4	_aSUREFIRE SYSTEMS LTD V GUARDIAN ECL LTD
650	2	4	_aTORCH OFFSHORE LLC V CABLE SHIPPING INC
650	2	4	_aMCCLEAN HOMES SOUTH EAST LTD V BLACKDALE LTD
650	2	4	_aKALMNEFT V GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AG
650	2	4	_aDULWICH ESTATE V BAPTISTE
650	2	4	_aSINCLAIR V WOODS OF WINCHESTER LTD
650	2	4	_aAL-HADHA TRADING CO V TRADIGRAIN SA
650	2	4	_aNAGUSINA NAVIERA V ALLIED MARITIME INC
650	2	4	_aL BROWN AND SONS LTD V CROSBY HOMES (NORTH WEST) LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
942			_n0
999			_c81141 _d81141