000			01981cab a22003735a 4500
001			L146409
008			090116s2008 xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u146409
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aEsposito, Paolo
245	0	4	_aThe development of commercial law through case law _bis section 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996 stifling progress?
260			_c2008
490		0	_aArbitration _v74(4) November 2008, 429-438(10)
520			_aConsiders whether or not the arbitration process for commercial disputes, as set out in the English Arbitration Act 1996, is an impediment to the development of commercial law. Asks to what extent the English courts should continue to play a creative role in developing commercial law. Includes examples of cases drawn from a number of jurisdictions.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S69
650	2	4	_aMARDOF PEACH AND CO LTD V ATTICA SEA CARRIERS CORP OF LIBERIA, THE LACONIA
650	2	4	_aCANDLER V CRANE CHRISTMAS AND CO
650	2	4	_aHAMILTON V MENDES
650	2	4	_aUNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES ART 33(3)
650	2	4	_aB.T.P.TIOXIDE LTD V PIONEER SHIPPING LTD AND ARMADA MARINE SA, THE NEMA
650	2	4	_aANTAIOS COMPANIA NAVIERA SA V SALEN REDERIERNA A.B.
650	2	4	_aRELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD V ENRON OIL AND GAS INDIA LTD
650	2	4	_aTRANSFIELD SHIPPING INC V MERCATOR SHIPPING INC (THE ACHILLEAS)
650	2	4	_aLOBB V AINTREE
650	2	4	_aDEMCO INVESTMENTS AND COMMERCIAL SA V SE BANKEN FORSAKRING HOLDING AKTIEBOLAG
650	2	4	_aLESOTHO HIGHLANDS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V IMPREGLIO SPA
650	2	4	_aARAB AFRICAN ENERGY CORP LTD V OLIEPRODUKTEN NEDERLAND NV
650	2	4	_aSUMAKAN LTD V COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT
650	2	4	_aUNIDROIT (INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR THE UNIFICATION OF PRIVATE LAW)
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
942			_n0
999			_c81142 _d81142