000			01896cad a22002055a 4500
001			L146571
008			090204e20081210xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u146571
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aAir Design (Kent) Limited v Deerglen (Jersey) Limited _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_a[2008] EWHC 3047 (TCC), 10 December 2008. Case considers whether an adjudicator's decision can be resisted at enforcement stage if it concerns more than one contract. Deerglen (D) contracted with Air Design (K) for provision of mechanical services under a "basebuild contract". In May 2007, D again required K to accomplish fit-outs work in behalf of a tenant. There was no formal contract for these works but a letter of intent. In September 2007, D and K entered an agreement for K to provide a Building Management System. In November 2007, D sent a letter to K summing up the value of all the work done by K, with a method and a timetable for all future payments. Disagreements arose as to the value of the work done, the amount left unpaid and the validity of contra charges. They referred these disagreements to adjudication. D argued that there were four different contracts, K that there was just one contract with variations. The adjudicator concluded that it was just one contract. The matter reached the court on the issue of enforcement of the adjudicator's decision. "Held": The judge considered that there was only one contract with variations and enforced the adjudicator's decision.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aAIR DESIGN (KENT) LIMITED V DEERGLEN (JERSEY) LIMITED
650	2	4	_aWIMBLEDON CONSTRUCTION CO 2000 LTD V VAGO
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2008/3047.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942			_n0
999			_c81190 _d81190