000			01443cab a22002295a 4500
001			L146641
008			090210e20090206xxka f g 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u146641
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aTolson, Simon
245	0	4	_aThe price of darkness
260			_c2009
490			_aBuilding _v274(8565) 6 February 2009, 51(1)
520			_aArticle looks at recent right to light cases in the courts and advises practitioners to be aware of private rights and to factor them in to development plans from an early stage. Mentions that damages are meant to be compensatory as opposed to punitive and suggests that the courts will generally be capable of determining between petitioners who are genuinely concerned about the effects of new developments and those who are simply seeking increased material returns for inconvenience that may, in reality, be fairly minimal. Mentions that compensation by damages is only meant to be exercised in exceptional circumstances and states that the burden of proving why it is appropriate to pay 'buy out' damages falls upon the developer to prove.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aFORSYTH-GRANT V ALLEN
650	2	4	_aTAMARES (VINCENT SQUARE) LTD V FAIRPOINT PROPERTIES (VINCENT SQUARE) LTD
650	2	4	_aWROTHAM PARK ESTATE CO LTD V PARKSIDE HOMES LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-EASEMENTS-RIGHTS TO LIGHT DETERMINATION
942			_n0
999			_c81218 _d81218