| 000 | 02185cad a22002175a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L146824 | ||
| 008 | 090303e20090119xxk f v 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u146824 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 4 |
_aThe Dorchester Hotel Limited v Vivid Interiors Limited _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 | _c2009 | ||
| 520 | _a[2009] EWHC 70 (TCC), 19 January 2009. The case considers a dispute over a final account claim, a complaint of an adjudication timetable too short to allow proper examination of documentation and the possibility of a breach of natural justice. The Dorchester Hotel Ltd (D) contracted with Vivid Interiors Ltd (V) for refurbishment works. Once works completed, V sent its final account to D. In December 2008, V commenced adjudication proceedings in respect with payment for his works. The date of the end of adjudication was extended to 28 February 2009. As documentation, V gave a referral notice with 37 arch files. V also produced a different final account than the previous one. D argued that the timetable was too tight to examine the new evidence and the revised figures, and that there was a risk of natural breach of justice. V argued that the court had no jurisdiction to intervene in an ongoing adjudication. "Held": The court has jurisdiction to intervene, particularly if there has been or will be a breach of natural justice. However, this should be done in exceptional cases. The judge could not at this stage state that there would be a breach of natural justice. The timetable could still reach a fair result. The claimant could still use his claim of breach of natural justice in the future if unhappy with adjudicator's decision. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aDORCHESTER HOTEL LIMITED V VIVID INTERIORS LIMITED |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aVITPOL BUILDING SERVICE V SAMEN |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aCJP BUILDERS LIMITED V WILLIAM VERRY LIMITED |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2009/70.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailli.org... |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c81300 _d81300 |
||