000			01688cad a22001935a 4500
001			L146900
008			090309e20090204xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u146900
041	0		_aeng
245	0	4	_aMead General Building Ltd v Dartmoor Properties Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2009
520			_a[2009] EWHC 200 (TCC) , 04 February 2009. The case considers whether to grant a stay of execution on adjudication enforcement proceedings when the claimant is subject to a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA). Dartmoor Properties Ltd (D) contracted with Mead General Building Ltd (M) to carry out a development scheme. A dispute arose between M and D and the matter was brought to adjudication. The adjudicator ordered D to pay M a certain amount, which D refused to do. M sought to enforce the adjudicator's decision. D contested on the grounds that, because M was subject to a CVA, any judgment should be granted a stay of execution. "Held": the fact that M is subject to a CVA is a relevant factor to the Court to decide whether or not to grant a stay of execution of the judgment. M's financial difficulties were due to D's non payment of the sums awarded by the adjudicator. On this basis, the court refused to order a stay of execution.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aMEAD GENERAL BUILDING LTD V DARTMOOR PROPERTIES LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2009/200.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942			_n0
999			_c81320 _d81320