000			01405cab a22002655a 4500
001			L147181
008			090408e20090404xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u147181
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aJeffries, Thomas
245	0	0	_aQualified success
260			_c2009
490		0	_aEstates Gazette _v(0913) 4 April 2009, 134-136(3)
520			_aExplains that residential headleases have become more important in recent collective leasehold enfranchisement cases. Focuses on the House of Lords ruling in Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio, on whether a flat occupied by the head lessee could be subject to a collective enfranchisement claim under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 S2, and the Lands Tribunal decision in Nailrile Ltd v Earl Cadogan, on the valuation of intermediate leases. Argues that although some issues have been resolved, others have not.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aNAILRILE LTD V EARL CADOGAN
650	2	4	_aHOWARD DE WALDEN ESTATES LTD V AGGIO AND ORS
650	2	4	_aMCGUCKIAN'S APPEAL, RE
650	2	4	_aEARL CADOGAN AND ANOTHER V SPORTELLI AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S2
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MARKET
942			_n0
999			_c81418 _d81418