000			02012cad a22002415a 4500
001			L147202
008			090415e20090108xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u147202
041	0		_aeng
245	0	4	_aOSC Building Services Limited v Interior Dimensions Contracts Limited _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2009
520			_a[2009] EWHC 248 (TCC), 08 January 2009. The case considers whether an adjudicator can decide the value of an interim payment when the notice of adjudication refers to a dispute about a final account payment. Interior Dimensions Contract Limited (D), main contractor, engaged OSC Building Services Limited (O) to carry out drainage and site access works. Upon completion, O sent an application for payment entitled "Draft final account". D disagreed on the amount and referred the case to adjudication. The adjudicator ordered D to pay a lump sum. The case went to court, where D argued that this money could not be paid because the adjudicator considered the case as an interim account dispute. "Held": The judge concluded that the dispute was about the disagreement on the amount to be paid. The judge decided that the dispute referred was not a final account. The adjudicator was entitled to decide the sum of the interim payment despite the wording of the adjudication notice.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aOSC BUILDING SERVICES LIMITED V INTERIOR DIMENSIONS CONTRACTS LIMITED
650	2	4	_aNORDOT ENGINEERING SERVICES LTD V SIEMANS PLC
650	2	4	_aWESTMINSTER CHEMICALS AND PRODUCE LTD V EICHOLZ AND LOESER
650	2	4	_aPROJECT CONSULTANCY GROUP V TRUSTEES OF THE GRAY TRUST
650	2	4	_aTHOMAS-FREDRIC'S (CONSTRUCTION) LTD V WILSON
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2009/248.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942			_n0
999			_c81429 _d81429