000			02074cad a22002655a 4500
001			L147203
008			090415e20081208xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u147203
041	0		_aeng
245	0	4	_aPT Building Services Limited v ROK Build Limited _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2009
520			_a[2008] EWHC 3434 (TCC), 08 December 2008. The case considers whether a party is irrevocably bound by his choice. ROK Build Limited (R) engaged PT Building Services Limited (P) to carry out works for it. They had a dispute over their contract brought to adjudication. P sought enforcement of an adjudicator's decision. R resisted enforcement of this decision on the grounds that the adjudicator had no jurisdiction. P issued a notice of second adjudication. R objected that the second adjudicator had no jurisdiction because the grounds of dispute had already been dealt with by the first adjudication. The second adjudicator resigned. P argued that this argument meant that R was accepting the decision of the first adjudicator as valid and binding. "Held": The judge decided that by using the first decision to persuade the second adjudicator to resign, R was accepting his decision as valid and binding. R could not now resist this first decision in enforcement proceedings.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aPT BUILDING SERVICES LIMITED V ROK BUILD LIMITED
650	2	4	_aNIKKO HOTELS (UK) LTD V MEPC PLC
650	2	4	_aBOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD
650	2	4	_aCARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD V DEVONPORT ROYAL DOCKYARD LTD
650	2	4	_aHART INVESTMENTS LTD V FIDLER AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aCOLLINS (CONTRACTORS) LTD V BALTIC QUAY MANAGEMENT (1994) LTD
650	2	4	_aAMEC CIVIL ENGINEERING LTD V SOS TRANSPORT
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2008/3434.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942			_n0
999			_c81430 _d81430