000 01098cab a22002655a 4500
001 L147446
008 090512e20090317xxk f 000 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u147446
041 0 _aeng
100 1 _aMartin, John
245 0 0 _aMore useful than you'd think
260 _c2009
490 0 _aSolicitor's Journal
_v153(10) 17 March 2009.13(1)
520 _aDiscusses how the recent interpretation of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 S30(1)(c) in Fowles v Heathrow Airport [2008] EWCA Civ 1270] has strengthened the position of landlords of business premises who seek to oppose the renewal of a tenancy.
590 _aKA
650 2 4 _aBEARD V WILLIAMS
650 2 4 _aFOWLES V HEATHROW AIRPORT LTD
650 2 4 _aTURNER AND BELL V SEARLES (STANFORD-LE-HOPE) LTD
650 2 4 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S30 (1)(c)
650 2 4 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S30 (1)(a)
650 2 4 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S30 (1)(b)
651 4 _aEngland and Wales
_y1543-
690 _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-BREACHES
942 _n0
999 _c81540
_d81540