000			01739cad a22002895a 4500
001			L147870
008			090625e20090611xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u147870
041	0		_aeng
245	0	4	_aFreeman v London Borough of Islington _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2009
520			_a[2009] EWCA Civ 536, 11 June 2009. The case relates to the meaning of "resided with" in the Housing Act 1985 S87. Ms Freeman (F) appealed against a decision to make a possession order concerning a flat in favour of the London Borough of Islington. F's father had a secure tenancy for this flat. When his health deteriorated, F, who had another flat, moved in with him. The judge had considered that for the purposes of the Housing Act 1985 S87, she had not resided with him even though she stayed in the flat with him full-time. "Held": appealed dismissed. The judge had correctly decided on the case. F was looking after her father, fulfilling her natural duty to him. She was not making the flat her home. The judge was right in considering that she was not residing with her father.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aFREEMAN V LONDON BOROUGH OF ISLINGTON
650	2	4	_aSWANBRAE LTD V ELLIOTT
650	2	4	_aHILDEBRAND V MOON
650	2	4	_aEDMUNDS V JONES
650	2	4	_aCOLLIER V STONEMAN
650	2	4	_aGOVERNORS OF THE PEABODY DONATION FUND V GRANT
650	2	4	_aFOREMAN V BEAGLEY
650	2	4	_aMORGAN V MURCH
650	2	4	_aHOUSING ACT 1985 S87
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/536.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942			_n0
999			_c81662 _d81662