000			01550cad a22001935a 4500
001			E147871
008			090625e20090618xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u147871
041	0		_aeng
245	0	4	_aAdler v Ananhall Advisory & Consultancy Services Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2009
520			_a[2009] EWCA Civ 586, 18 June 2009. The case relates to an introductory agreement regarding a contract for the sale of a property. The issue in question was whether the introducer was entitled to payment under, or for breach of, the introductory agreement, and whether the introducer is itself liable in damages for fraudulent misrepresentation. The respondents, AACS had an introductory agreement with the appellant, A, relating to the purchase of an office building. The purchase did not complete on time, and when it fell through AACS claimed 1% of the purchase price and £75 000 from A. A in turn claimed for damages from AACS on the basis that they had failed to inform him of the real state of their negotiations regarding the property. Held: Appeal allowed in relation to the claim for payment by AACS, but the previous judge's dismissal of A's claim for damages for misrepresentation was upheld.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aADLER V ANANHALL ADVISORY AND CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/586.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942			_n0
999			_c81663 _d81663